Restricted Realms: World’s Most Extraordinary and Off-Limits Places
In a world full of well-known travel destinations, some incredible sites stay secret and unreachable to most people. For those who are adventurous enough to…
Varosha, the storied beachfront district of Famagusta on Cyprus’s eastern coast, lies today in eerie silence. Once a glamorous modern resort lined with high-rise hotels and buzzing cafes, it has been frozen in time since 1974. Today its decaying skyline and empty sands are accessible to only a handful of visitors and soldiers – a striking monument to the island’s division. Former residents describe Varosha as a place “like living next-door to ghosts,” a surreal ruin overrun by nature yet haunted by memory. This article traces Varosha’s dramatic arc: its mid-20th-century heyday, its sudden abandonment in the chaos of 1974, decades as a sealed military zone, and the contentious partial reopening of recent years. We explore the architectural legacy and biodiversity of the deserted town, its symbolic weight in the Cyprus peace process, and the hopes and conflicts stirred by plans to revive it.
Table of Contents
In the 1960s, Varosha blossomed as a beacon of modern tourism. Along this 5-kilometre Mediterranean shoreline, planners and entrepreneurs built gleaming hotels and apartment blocks in a sleek, international style – a vision echoed in the region’s boom era architecture. In the early 1970s, Varosha was known as “the crown jewel of Cyprus’s tourism industry,” boasting over 10,000 hotel beds in high-rise resorts reminiscent of Spain’s Costa Brava. Its palm-fringed beaches and warm climate made it a magnet for European holidaymakers and celebrities. Stars like Elizabeth Taylor, Richard Burton, and Brigitte Bardot famously vacationed there, and the Argo Hotel on JFK Avenue was said to be Elizabeth Taylor’s favourite. One local quipped that Varosha was the “French Riviera of Cyprus,” a stylish holiday capital where visitors “talk about it being the hub of art and intellectual activity”.
By 1973 Famagusta, of which Varosha was a suburb, was the island’s leading tourist city. Its skyline of modernist towers – a vivid contrast to the medieval walled city nearby – drew comparisons even to Las Vegas. As one expert noted, Varosha had earned nicknames like “the Riviera” or even “the Las Vegas of the Eastern Mediterranean,” where European elites once spent their holidays. In Varosha’s cafés and shops, the buzz of international tourism mingled with local Cypriot culture. Outside the hotels, vendors sold souvenirs, and palm trees swayed along walkways. The resort’s architecture blended Mediterranean motifs with contemporary flair: wide promenades, sea-view balconies and gardens, reflecting a globalized Cyprus eager to cultivate its image as a luxury destination.
Key Facts (Varosha, pre-1974): population ~39,000 (mostly Greek Cypriots); 6 km² area; cosmopolitan tourism infrastructure. By one count, Varosha alone accommodated tens of thousands of visitors at a time. Its orderly apartment blocks and hotels (“Rixos Lighthouse”, “Palm Beach Hotel”, etc.) were the epitome of mid-century holiday design, with flat roofs, swimming pools, and seaside glass facades.
Timeline of key events:
| Year | Event |
|---|---|
| 1960 | Republic of Cyprus founded; Famagusta area (including Varosha) under Cypriot rule. |
| 1960s–1970s | Varosha developed as modern beach resort; high-rise hotels built; tourism booms. |
| 15 July 1974 | Greek nationalist coup in Nicosia attempts union with Greece. |
| 20–August 1974 | Turkey invades Cyprus; Varosha captured by Turkish forces. 17,000 residents flee. |
| August 1974–2020 | Varosha fenced off by Turkish military; entry barred; area remains sealed. |
| 1984 | UN Security Council Resolution 550 condemns any settlement by non-inhabitants and calls for UN control of Varosha. |
| 1992 | UN Security Council Resolution 789 extends UN peacekeepers’ control to Varosha. |
| 2004 | UN Annan Plan for reunification envisages Varosha’s return to Greek Cypriots; plan rejected by Greek Cypriots. |
| 7 Aug 2017 | Northern Cyprus opens a small fenced beach at Varosha to Turks and Turkish Cypriots only. |
| 8 Oct 2020 | Turkish Cypriot leader announces opening of Varosha’s beachfront promenade (Erdogan visits). |
| 20 Jul 2021 | TRNC leader Ersin Tatar and Turkey’s President Erdogan announce “2nd phase”: 3.5% of Varosha (incl. promenade) to civilian use. |
| July 2021 | UN Security Council calls for immediate reversal of Varosha opening. |
| 2022–2024 | Partial reopening continues (tourist visits); international bodies (EU, UN, CoE) condemn actions. |
The peaceful life of Varosha came to an abrupt end in the hot summer of 1974. In early July, a coup d’état in Nicosia backed by the ruling junta of Greece overthrew President Makarios and sought union of Cyprus with Greece. Turkey – one of Cyprus’s guarantor powers – responded on 20 July 1974 by sending its army onto the island. Over the next days intense fighting engulfed Famagusta. By mid-August, Turkish forces advanced on the city, seizing Varosha. The Greek Cypriot residents of Varosha fled in panic. According to estimates, about 17,000 Greek Cypriots – nearly all of the suburb’s population – evacuated Varosha ahead of the Turkish advance in late August 1974. Women, children and the elderly boarded buses to the south as artillery boomed; they left behind homes, cars, and businesses literally overnight.
It was told that residents bolted their houses and ran, some even leaving their car keys in ignitions. The British sovereign bases at nearby Dhekelia provided a refuge for many fleeing Varosha; in fact, refugees poured into camps set up in the British zone. Within hours, Varosha’s streets were deserted. On 14 August 1974, Turkish commanders ordered Varosha sealed. Barbed-wire fencing and checkpoints were erected around the entire district, and all entry was forbidden. The iconic modern hotels and apartment blocks, once filled with families and tourists, stood suddenly empty. In the words of one observer, Varosha was transformed from thriving resort to “ghost town” overnight – “an eerie collection of derelict high-rise hotels and residences in a military zone nobody has been allowed to enter”.
The Turkish military’s move effectively froze Varosha as a fortress. Alongside Famagusta’s new Turkish Cypriot administration, Ankara took control of Varosha and kept it under military guard. A de facto partition of Cyprus followed: Turkish forces ultimately occupied some 37% of the island, establishing the unrecognised Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) in 1983. In contrast, the Greek Cypriots retained about 43% in the south. Varosha fell squarely on the Turkish side of the divide, immediately north of the United Nations Buffer Zone that runs through Famagusta. Any former Cypriot resident crossing from the Greek Cypriot south into Varosha now risked arrest.
Internationally, the invasion and partition drew swift condemnation. The UN Security Council called for a ceasefire (Resolutions 353 and 354) and later condemned the partition as unacceptable. Turkey invoked its rights under the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee, but many countries viewed the invasion as disproportionate. Nevertheless, by late 1974 a ceasefire held, leaving Varosha and the whole east of the island under Turkish control. In the decades since, Varosha remained a sealed military zone. No civilians – not Greek Cypriots nor anyone else – were permitted entry. According to Turkish Cypriot sources, the only people allowed inside Varosha were Turkish soldiers, and later some UN officials. “A car dealership still stocked with 1974 cars” and mannequins in hotel windows became silent testaments to the rushed abandonment.
Over the ensuing half-century, Varosha decayed in eerie silence. Roofs caved, walls crumbled, and plants reclaimed the streets. Within the fenced-off enclave, nature was allowed free rein. Dunes of sand drifted into once-tidy courtyards, and thick growth of prickly pear cactus and other scrub sprouted amid the ruins. Loggerhead sea turtles, which had hitherto nested on Varosha’s quiet beaches, returned unhindered by people – an astonishing sight in the Mediterranean. One returning Cypriot said, “Prickly pear bushes have overrun the entire six square kilometers. There are trees that have sprouted through living rooms. It’s a ghost town”.
Abandoned elegance: Towering hotels and apartment blocks – once symbols of modern luxury – stand empty in Varosha. Their skeletal forms, with broken windows and rusted balconies, loom silently over deserted streets. Christos, a Greek Cypriot who escaped in 1974, described returning near the fences years later: “You’re seeing nature take over. Prickly pear bushes…trees that have sprouted through living rooms. It’s a ghost town”. Even the beach – miles of golden sand – was overrun by wild vegetation and nesting turtles. In 2014 a BBC report noted that “rare sea turtles” were nesting on Varosha’s empty seafront, a vivid example of the unplanned biodiversity that flourished in abandonment.
For the fenced inhabitants of Cyprus, Varosha became a powerful symbol. The grey towers and sand-swept streets were visible reminders of war and loss. Former residents often call it a “living nightmare”: one Cypriot said she returned to see her childhood home behind a barbed fence, only to find “something like a post-apocalyptic nightmare”. A local remembers the shock of seeing mannequins still in store windows and cars from 1974 rusting in lots – vestiges of a world abruptly frozen. Many described Varosha as harboring a “romanticised notion” of the island’s past golden age.
Amid this decay, parts of Varosha have attracted “dark tourism.” Curiosity seekers occasionally risked sneaking into the zone to snap photographs of the ruins. The Turkish military responded by warning that any trespassers would be shot. In fact, signs on the barriers warned “no photography,” and the UN Peacekeepers patrolling the buffer zone sternly forbade any crossings. For outsiders, Varosha was often portrayed as a picturesque urban jungle: one travel writer described peeling paint, wild shrubs in window boxes, and even baby tufts of grass sprouting from plush hotel carpets left behind.
Symbolism and Legal Status: The United Nations never recognized Turkish sovereignty over Varosha. In May 1984, UNSC Resolution 550 declared that any attempt to settle Varosha “by people other than its inhabitants is inadmissible” and called for the area to be placed under UN administration. In 1992 Resolution 789 reiterated this and extended UN peacekeepers’ oversight to include Varosha. Throughout the 1990s and 2000s, every major Cyprus peace proposal – including the UN-sponsored Annan Plan of 2004 – treated Varosha as property of the original Greek Cypriot residents. Notably, the Annan Plan would have returned Varosha (about 20% of it initially) to those owners as part of a new federation. (Greek Cypriots rejected that plan, in which ¾ of Varosha would have ultimately returned.) International law cases, such as Loizidou v. Turkey and Lordos v. Turkey, have recognized the property rights of the displaced Varosha owners and ordered compensation for their losses. Thus, legally Varosha remains the lost property of its Greek Cypriot inhabitants, but geopolitically it stayed locked under Turkish and UN military control.
For decades, Varosha’s status has been a focal point in negotiations to resolve the Cyprus dispute. Every major summit or statement has mentioned it. Greek Cypriots have consistently demanded Varosha’s restoration as a precondition for a settlement, viewing its return as symbolic of justice and reconciliation. Turkish Cypriots and Turkey, in contrast, have insisted on first resuming talks on a new basis. The division of Cyprus hardened into an uneasy status quo: the north (including Varosha) governed as the TRNC, and the south as the Republic of Cyprus (an EU member since 2004).
The UN held the “Varosha file” open: the UN Peacekeeping force (UNFICYP) stationed at the village of Paralimni on the border frequently facilitated discussions of confidence-building, occasionally suggesting limited access for the original owners. In 2017, for example, UN talks contemplated a joint Greek/Turkish administration of Varosha temporarily. But without a comprehensive deal, such ideas foundered. In parallel, the UN Security Council on multiple occasions reiterated that no unilateral action in Varosha would be allowed. Notably, a UNSC Presidential Statement of October 2020 “reaffirmed the status of Varosha as set out in” Resolutions 550 and 789, and “reiterated that no actions should be carried out in relation to Varosha that are not in accordance with those resolutions.” In other words, the UN’s official line was that Varosha can only be returned to its lawful owners and under UN auspices, not through any external population or development.
The inability to resolve Varosha has blocked peace efforts. As a Council of Europe report noted in 2024, Varosha is “one of the most shocking traces of the intervention of the Turkish military in the North of Cyprus in 1974,” and its fate remains entangled with any final settlement. Draft resolutions in international bodies have repeatedly called for its return. For instance, the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe urged that Varosha be returned to its lawful inhabitants “in accordance with UN Security Council Resolutions 550 and 789, placing it under UN control”. Thus Varosha became a potent symbol in “frozen conflict” diplomacy: for Greek Cypriots, it embodies justice for the invasion’s victims; for Turkish Cypriots, it is a bargaining chip; and for many foreign diplomats, it is a litmus test of whether Turkey will respect international law.
Despite decades of closure, in late 2020 the Turkish and Turkish Cypriot authorities announced the beginning of a gradual reopening of Varosha – a move that upended the status quo and provoked an international outcry. On 6 October 2020, Turkish President Erdoğan and Turkish Cypriot leader Ersin Tatar jointly declared that the fenced-off coastline of Varosha would be opened to civilians. Within days, restricted sections of the beachfront promenade were unlocked for Turkish Cypriots (and tourists with passports) to visit. Although only a sliver of Varosha was involved initially (about 300 meters of shoreline and several blocks), it was the first time in 46 years that any part of the closed zone welcomed non-military visitors.
Turkish Cypriot officials framed this as a restoration of civil rights. Ersin Tatar spoke of Varosha’s reopening as part of rebuilding “our capital” and promised a “civilian administration” to manage it. Erdoğan hailed the move in grandiose terms: “A new era will begin in Maras which will benefit everyone,” he said at a 2020 ceremony. (Maras is the Turkish name for Varosha.) Erdoğan insisted that the decades-long embargo on Varosha had failed and suggested that Greek Cypriots had no right to sit on the land of Turkish Cypriots. In late 2020, Turkey’s foreign ministry denounced UN positions on Varosha as “unfounded” and insisted Varosha was Turkish territory from 1974 onward.
The move quickly enraged the Greek Cypriot government and its allies. Cyprus’s President Nicos Anastasiades accused Turkey of a “clear violation” of UN resolutions and illegal expropriation. Greece’s Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis warned of possible EU sanctions unless Turkey stepped back. In October 2020, Cyprus’s foreign minister appealed to the UN Security Council, which issued a press statement condemning the decision and calling for its reversal. The UNSC reminded all parties that “no actions should be carried out in relation to Varosha” outside the agreed UN framework. The EU explicitly called the reopening “unilateral” and “inadmissible,” with European Council President Charles Michel and EU foreign affairs chief Josep Borrell both warning Turkey that it risked breaching Cyprus-related obligations. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken similarly called the reopening “unacceptable” and urged reversal.
On 20 July 2021 – the 47th anniversary of the invasion – the TRNC announced a further “second phase” opening. The Turkish Cypriots said 3.5% of Varosha’s area (roughly 136 hectares) would be shifted from military to civilian control, beyond the already open promenade. President Erdoğan, visiting the north, repeated his defiant tone: Varosha was now “TRNC territory,” and he celebrated breaking what he called the UN’s “failure” on Cyprus. He echoed that Varosha’s reopening would create prosperity “for the good of everyone” on the island. Prime Minister Tatar said a 10-billion-euro investment was needed to revive Varosha, and TRNC forces began drawing up zoning and development plans.
The partial reopening of Varosha in 2020 allowed some Turkish Cypriots and tourists onto its abandoned beaches. Above, visitors walk along Varosha’s fenced-off beachfront, framed by a ruined hotel. This marked the first time in decades that civilians stepped onto Varosha’s shores legally. While the area is open, control remains tightly held: only people with Turkish or TRNC passports were permitted through checkpoints, and the TRNC municipality rented out umbrellas and sunbeds to Turkish Cypriots.
Greece, Cyprus, and much of the international community reacted angrily. The UN Security Council – in a unanimous July 2021 statement – demanded “the immediate reversal” of all steps taken since October 2020, warning that unilateral acts on Varosha “undermine the prospects of reaching a comprehensive settlement”. The European Parliament in late 2020 even called for sanctions on Turkey if the opening went ahead. In Washington, the U.S. joined the chorus: a State Department spokesperson labeled any attempt to settle Varosha by outsiders as “contrary to UN resolutions” and unacceptable.
Turkey and Northern Cyprus, for their part, simply rejected this criticism. Ankara’s government and its media portrayed the UN and EU statements as biased. Turkish Foreign Ministry spokesmen noted that Turkey had never recognized the Republic of Cyprus as the sole government, and reminded critics that during peace negotiations Cyprus’s leader had implicitly accepted a two-zone outcome. The TRNC leadership condemned European demands as “dictated by Greek Cypriots,” insisting Varosha’s fate should be decided by both communities. In a gesture of defiance, even before opening any new areas in 2021 the TRNC fired the Cyprus passports of 14 officials (including Tatar) seen as responsible for Greek Cypriot property rights, under a law branding them “public enemies”.
The Varosha dispute quickly drew in external powers. The United States, European Union, United Kingdom, and United Nations all issued statements urging restraint. Among UN actors, Secretary-General António Guterres continued pushing for renewed talks and reiterated that Varosha should return to its lawful owners under UN auspices. The Security Council’s 23 July 2021 statement – unprecedentedly critical – was supported even by Turkey’s traditional ally Pakistan; only the US abstained rather than block the language. In Brussels, EU leaders at successive summits “welcomed” calls from Cyprus and Greece for sanctions, though they stopped short of new measures. Still, the EU’s foreign policy chief Borrell warned that if Turkey pressed on, it could face political consequences. Even the European Parliament – normally a forum of symbolical resolutions – passed a strong non-binding motion in late 2020 condemning Turkey and calling for financial penalties.
It wasn’t all condemnation. Some smaller voices pleaded calm. A handful of left-wing activists and NGOs argued that keeping Varosha closed actually prevented real reconciliation. Turkish Cypriot civic groups (often critical of their own leadership) pointed out that the opening of a beach segment was a minimal confidence-building step, since it did no more than what the TRNC had already unilaterally promised years earlier. Indeed, even within Northern Cyprus there was dissent. After the 2017 beach opening, civil society organizations in Nicosia and Famagusta declared a boycott of Varosha, calling its continued occupation “a shame for humanity” and comparing the closed beach to the “white-only beaches” of apartheid South Africa. Some Turkish Cypriots worried that their leaders were using Varosha as a populist ploy ahead of elections.
Opposition politicians in Ankara and the Turkish Cypriot community raised alarms as well. Former TRNC President Mustafa Akinci (himself a co-signer of the 2004 Annan Plan) criticized any unilateral reopening, warning that it would cement permanent partition. He and others warned that risking peace talks might isolate Turkey and harden Greek Cypriot intransigence. Within the EU, Cyprus’s main argument was that the island-wide settlement talks should resume only on a bicommunal, bizonal basis (the 1960 constitution model). Turkish officials by contrast began talking openly about two sovereign states in Cyprus, reflecting a growing acceptance of permanent division.
By mid-2021, however, neither side was backing down. Varosha remained at the forefront of Cyprus diplomacy: every international meeting of guarantor countries (Turkey, Greece, UK) or UN envoys mentioned it. In June 2022, for example, UN mediator Jane Holl Lute briefed the Security Council specifically on Varosha, pressing for steps that respected international law. In Europe, Greek and Cypriot leaders used every summit with Turkey (NATO meetings, EU-Turkey dialogues) to demand a halt to Varosha’s opening. Turkey in return hardened its position, signaling it would continue redeveloping the area regardless of external criticism.
With parts of Varosha now open for visitors, the question turns to what comes next. For decades, the town lay neglected, its infrastructure crumbling. Now local authorities in Northern Cyprus have begun drawing up plans to repopulate and rebuild Varosha – though under whose authority remains contested. The TRNC government has floated proposals for hotels, apartments, and shopping in the reopened zone, promising that Varosha will “return to its former state” of prosperity. Reports even mention a draft master plan calling for modern tourism facilities integrated with cultural preservation. Some visionaries speak of a mixed-use resurrection: hotels and marinas alongside museums to commemorate 1974 and peace parks to bring communities together.
Many on the Turkish Cypriot side anticipate economic benefits. The TRNC economy is heavily dependent on tourism and subsidies from Turkey. Reviving Varosha, even partially, could attract new visitors (in 2021 a small tourism boom was noted along the Gazimağusa coast). Proponents cite figures like 10 billion euros of potential investment needed to restore Varosha fully. The municipality of Gazimağusa (Famagusta) has suggested ambitious development that envisions doubling the district’s population once safe return of original owners is possible. (Greek Cypriot authorities of the Republic of Cyprus reacted by threatening to block EU funds to the north if any development subsidized by European grants was allowed.)
However, the endeavor faces daunting challenges. The abandoned buildings are structurally unsound; years of neglect mean that many must be demolished or fully rebuilt. Any redevelopment plan must reckon with contested property rights. The Greek Cypriots who own much of the land demand either full return or compensation. The Cypriot government has insisted it will never recognize any implementation of the 1974 refugee property law (known as the Immovable Property Commission) that was set up by Northern Cyprus. Indeed, under TRNC law, the original owners were stripped of their citizenship rights. Thus reviving Varosha without resolving these legal quagmires could spark new disputes.
There are also cultural and environmental conservation concerns. Varosha’s long isolation has allowed rare species to flourish on its coast. Experts note that its beaches are important nesting grounds for loggerhead turtles, which are protected under European law. Some environmental groups argue that before any redevelopment, thorough ecological assessments must be done. Varosha’s abandoned buildings and street layouts also have heritage value: they represent a unique snapshot of 1960s cosmopolitan Cyprus. UNESCO (which inscribed Famagusta’s Old Town as a World Heritage Site in 2013) has cautioned against altering the character of the area without stringent safeguards. Conservationists worry that hasty construction could destroy the very “authenticity” that makes Varosha intriguing as a ruin.
Local ideas have emerged to balance preservation with renewal. Notably, some Cypriots propose transforming Varosha into an eco-city and peace park – essentially a living memorial. Young architect Vasia Markides (whose family hails from Varosha) envisions an urban ecology project: weaving green spaces, art installations and community centers into the deserted blocks, making Varosha a model for sustainability and bicommunal tourism. She has rallied both Greek and Turkish Cypriot supporters to this cause, emphasizing environmental cleanup and cultural reconciliation. As Markides puts it, she “felt driven to see this place revive,” sensing that Varosha still held the “energy…that was once there”. Some academics and planners have sketched out “soft reuse” plans – retaining facades, installing botanical gardens on former plazas, and creating museums that tell the story of divided Cyprus.
On the ground, a tentative tourism revival is underway. Since 2020, authorities have issued special permits allowing tourists to enter Varosha by guided tours. According to Turkish media, by mid-2024 over 1.8 million people had visited Varosha’s shores. In practice, most visitors are day-trippers from Northern Cyprus (and Turkey), who walk along the reopened beachfront or peer into the town through fences. Hotels and restaurants have not yet reopened inside Varosha; instead, kiosks and cafe stands serve refreshments on the beach. Local businesses in nearby Famagusta have started catering to these visitors, offering bike rentals (as seen outside the checkpoint) and photography tours.
However, tensions remain palpable. Greek Cypriots see even these tours as normalization of an illegal status quo. Some Greek Cypriots who occasionally cross into the buffer zone to glimpse Varosha refuse to set foot inside, viewing any participation as legitimizing the takeover. The division of memory lingers: Greek Cypriots often speak of Varosha in hushed tones, mourning lost family homes; Turkish Cypriots who grew up under its shadow talk of curiosity and opportunism. “Varosha is in our DNA, for better or worse,” says one Turkish Cypriot guide. For now, Varosha stands as a contested space – partly a tourist curiosity, partly a national symbol, and partly a bargaining chip.
Varosha today is not just an urban relic; it is also an ecosystem in microcosm. Biologists note that urban wildlife has found refuge here. In the quiet ruins, feral cats roam freely, jackdaws nest in shuttered windows, and wild shrubs reclaim asphalt. The prickly pear cactus (nopal) has become ubiquitous; locals comment that its fruit, “babutsa,” became a new harvest for villagers around Famagusta. Intriguingly, a plant virus that hit the babutsa in Varosha ended up spreading into gardens outside, a reminder of how even an abandoned zone cannot stay isolated ecologically. Varosha’s story thus resonates in disciplines as diverse as conflict studies and urban ecology: it is a “real-estate crisis” for former owners, but also a living laboratory of how nature colonizes human ruins.
Culturally, Varosha occupies the minds of Cypriots as a “psychological landscape of memory.” For many Greek Cypriots, it is a lost paradise of childhood summers; for Turkish Cypriots, it symbolizes both opportunity and a reminder of defeat. This duality shows up in art, literature, and oral history. Photographers and filmmakers have long been drawn to its empty corridors – an uncanny backdrop illustrating loss. The ghost town metaphor appears in local discourse. For instance, a Turkish Cypriot who watched Varosha decay from her nearby home described it simply: “It was just like living next-door to ghosts.”.
Both communities attach deep symbolism: to Greeks, Varosha stands for displacement and international betrayal; to Turks, it represents a hard-won security zone (to some) or a stain on their cause (to others). Commentators sometimes note that Varosha is as much in the mind as on the map: historians argue that any settlement of Cyprus must find a way to deal with Varosha’s legacy – whether by returning it, compensating owners, or building a memorial. In the absence of a peace treaty, Varosha remains a barometer of intercommunal tensions and a litmus test for any proposed “two-state” formulas.
Varosha’s arc – from sunlit resort to silent ghost town – encapsulates the larger Cypriot tragedy. Its shutters have been closed for over fifty years, and the debate over its future rages on. Recent partial reopenings have brought new attention but also inflamed old grievances. As of 2025, Varosha remains a divided plot: one Turkey’s rhetoric, one Cyprus’s claims, one the UN’s unanswered resolutions. Yet even in this limbo, new layers are added: nature’s renewal, budding plans for sustainable redevelopment, and the resilience of memory.
In today’s Varosha, cranes have not yet started building, but cautious tourists can walk its beach and feel the creak of weathered balconies. The international community watches closely. Will Varosha remain an instrument of deadlock – or can it become a bridge, however tenuous, between two Cypriot peoples? Time will tell, but the town’s empty silhouettes will continue to stir passions and imaginations long after its lights were first turned off.
In a world full of well-known travel destinations, some incredible sites stay secret and unreachable to most people. For those who are adventurous enough to…
France is recognized for its significant cultural heritage, exceptional cuisine, and attractive landscapes, making it the most visited country in the world. From seeing old…
Precisely built to be the last line of protection for historic cities and their people, massive stone walls are silent sentinels from a bygone age.…
From Alexander the Great's inception to its modern form, the city has stayed a lighthouse of knowledge, variety, and beauty. Its ageless appeal stems from…
With its romantic canals, amazing architecture, and great historical relevance, Venice, a charming city on the Adriatic Sea, fascinates visitors. The great center of this…
