Ani, a once-thriving medieval Armenian metropolis that is now in ruins, represents the Bagratid Kingdom’s magnificence and intricacy. Ani is located in present-day Turkey’s Kars Province, near the closed border with Armenia, in a strategically significant but isolated position. The city, commonly referred to as the “City of 1,001 Churches,” conjures up visions of magnificence and religious significance, despite the fact that the actual number of churches falls far short of this designation. Today, its archaeological remains provide unique insights into Armenia’s medieval history, architectural accomplishments, and cultural and religious significance.
Between 961 until 1045, Ani was the booming capital of the Bagratid Armenian Kingdom, and it experienced tremendous political, cultural, and economic development. The kingdom spanned much of modern-day Armenia and parts of eastern Turkey, with Ani at its center. The city’s placement on major trade routes added to its importance, with commerce flowing through its gates, increasing both its riches and authority. Ani, with its magnificent palaces, religious complexes, and cutting-edge fortifications, was an architectural marvel of its day.
Ani is said to have had a population of more than 100,000 at its peak. This statistic, while rather optimistic given the city’s relatively small size, highlights Ani’s standing as one of the world’s largest urban centers during the early medieval period. The city’s most iconic features were its ecclesiastical architecture, with the Cathedral of Ani serving as the pinnacle. Scholars claim that this cathedral, a masterpiece of early Gothic architecture, had a significant impact on the design of Europe’s great cathedrals, particularly its ribbed vaulting, which did not emerge in European cathedrals until centuries later.
Ani’s architectural landscape was as diverse as the people who lived there. The city has around 100 excavated buildings, including 50 churches, 33 cave chapels, and 20 smaller chapels. These structures show not just the religious passion of the time, but also the advanced engineering and artistic accomplishments of their creators. The Cathedral of Ani, one of the city’s most notable monuments, is widely regarded as one of the oldest examples of ribbed vaulting design. This innovation, which would become a trademark of Gothic architecture, differentiated Ani from other medieval cities and contributed to its position as an architectural pioneer.
In addition to the cathedral, Ani featured a number of minor churches, castles, and fortresses with architectural influences from Byzantium, Armenia, and Islam. The city’s well-planned urban structure, complete with broad streets and powerful defensive walls, demonstrated the Bagratid Armenians’ superior knowledge of urban planning and military construction. The existence of multiple churches and chapels, each with beautiful carvings and frescoes, added to the city’s cultural and religious vitality.
Ani’s success, however, would not continue. The Mongols devastated the city in 1236, commencing its demise. This damage, while devastating, was not the only cause of Ani’s downfall. A severe earthquake in 1319 exacerbated the city’s already deteriorating condition, producing a landscape of ruin and despair. Ani’s abandonment during the 17th century was mostly due to the relocation of regional commerce routes that had previously passed through it. As business and influence migrated elsewhere, Ani’s once-proud monuments fell into disrepair, and the city’s population shrank.
Despite being abandoned for centuries, the city’s historical and cultural significance has never dimmed. Ani remained an enduring emblem of Armenian ancestry, as well as a reminder of the Bagratid Kingdom’s former glory. Over the ages, the ruins of Ani have become a magnet for archaeologists, historians, and visitors seeking to comprehend the history of this once-mighty metropolis.
Today, Ani is a symbol of Armenian cultural, religious, and national pride. As a “tangible” representation of the kingdom’s former prominence, it serves as a reminder of Armenia’s long and rich history. According to historian Razmik Panossian, Ani is one of the most apparent ties to Armenia’s medieval greatness, representing the country’s cultural and spiritual history. This connection to the past is especially important for Armenians, as the city provides a sense of continuity with their old civilization, which dates back thousands of years.
In 2016, Ani was named to the UNESCO World Heritage List in consideration of its cultural and historical significance. This designation is the culmination of decades of international efforts to protect the site and increase awareness of its importance. Ani’s evolution from a scene of political turmoil to a cultural tourism destination marks a shift in how the world understands the region’s complex past. Ani is currently a destination where visitors may learn about Armenia’s medieval history while also promoting cross-cultural understanding.
Ani’s setting enhances its allure. Ani’s inherent defenses made it a good location for habitation and fortification. The Akhurian River, a branch of the Araks River, is part of Turkey’s closed border with Armenia, making Ani a source of geopolitical stress throughout much of its history. The city’s elevation of around 1,340 meters (4,400 feet) strengthened its defensive posture, affording magnificent views of the surrounding countryside.
Ani is currently located in Turkey’s Kars Province, which is noted for its animal trading and cheese production. The city of Kars, an important regional hub, is located near Ani and acts as a gateway for visitors to the archaeological site. Ani’s proximity to the Armenia-Turkey border, while politically sensitive, adds to the site’s appeal by symbolizing the two countries’ complex and frequently hostile relationship.
Ani, once a great metropolis that served as the center of Armenian culture and politics, is now a mesmerizing ruin in Turkey. The city’s history stretches back millennia, depicting a dramatic ascent, thriving culture, terrible fall, and ongoing archaeological fascination.
The story of Ani starts in antiquity. Armenian chroniclers, such as Yeghishe and Ghazar Parpetsi, first referenced the city in the fifth century. They described it as a powerful castle located on a hilltop, its strategic location emphasizing the city’s military importance. At the time, Ani was part of the Armenian Kamsarakan dynasty’s territories, an area that was vital in Armenia’s early feudal framework. Though its significance during this period is uncertain, the groundwork for Ani’s future ascension was already in place.
By the ninth century, Ani had been absorbed into the Armenian Bagratuni Kingdom, signaling the beginning of its rise. The Bagratuni dynasty, which took sovereignty from Arab conquerors, had a significant impact on Armenia’s political landscape. Under King Ashot I, the Bagratunis achieved independence by regaining regions from Persian and Arab domination. This period saw a rearrangement of power, with Ani emerging as a key figure in the newly formed Armenian state.
Ani’s status grew dramatically after Ashot III relocated the capital from Kars to Ani in 961. The city’s reputation as a political and cultural center was cemented during the reign of King Gagik I (989-1020), who presided over the city’s golden period. Ani grew into a significant hub of trade, commerce, and study, attracting merchants and academics from a variety of empires, including the Byzantine and Persian. Ani’s population grew, and the city received the nicknames “City of Forty Gates” and “City of a Thousand and One Churches,” which reflected its majestic architecture and religious significance.
The Bagratuni dynasty’s most noteworthy architectural contribution in Ani was the Cathedral of Ani, a masterpiece of Armenian architecture that still stands as a symbol of the city’s previous splendor. Internal struggle within the Bagratuni family, as well as external challenges from the Byzantine Empire, eventually led to Ani’s demise. Following the death of King Gagik I, Ani became divided and conflicted, eventually surrendering to Byzantine dominance in 1046.
Ani was more than just a political capital; it was a bustling cultural and economic hub. Because of its location on important commercial routes, the city became a hub for trade between the Byzantine Empire, the Persian Empire, Arab nations, and even distant Central Asia. Ani’s wealth, resulting from its strategic location and robust trade, allowed for the construction of splendid public structures, castles, and churches that combined Armenian, Byzantine, and Persian architectural styles.
The city was also known for its intellectual life, which included professors and religious leaders. In 992, the Armenian Catholicosate relocated its seat to Ani, establishing the city as a religious center. Its powerful walls and well-designed gates reflected both its military prowess and its function as a symbol of Armenian cultural and religious identity.
Ani’s decline began with the Seljuk onslaught in the mid-11th century. In 1064, the Seljuk Turks, led by Alp Arslan, besieged Ani for 25 days, killing all of its residents and plundering and destroying the city. Sibt ibn al-Jawzi’s eyewitness account gives a horrifying image of the carnage, which left streets littered with bodies and over 50,000 detainees captured. This event signaled the start of Ani’s steady decline from its status as a great and affluent city.
After the Seljuks captured Ani, the Shaddadids, a Muslim Kurdish dynasty, purchased it. Despite the shift in rulers, Ani’s Armenian population remained substantial, and the city experienced periodic strife between the Shaddadids and the Georgian Kingdom, which frequently interfered to protect its Christian residents. Ani came under Georgian authority in 1199, but it was soon invaded by the Seljuks, who destroyed the city in 1217 and 1220.
The seizure of Ani by Georgian Queen Tamar in 1199 marked a period of relative prosperity for the Zakarid dynasty. The Zakarids, descendants of the Bagratids, strove to restore Ani’s greatness by rebuilding its defenses and erecting new churches. However, the city’s revival was short-lived, since the Mongols arrived in the middle of the 13th century.
Ani fell to the Mongol Empire in 1239, following a brief period of resistance. The Mongols destroyed much of the city, murdering the residents and left it in ruins. The Mongol invasion wrecked Ani’s once-thriving economic and governmental framework, resulting in the city’s eventual abandonment. Despite efforts by Armenians and Georgians to negotiate peace with the Mongols, Ani never recovered its previous glory.
In the centuries following the Mongol conquest, Ani remained a contested area. Various Turkish dynasties, including the Jalayrids and Kara Koyunlu, took possession of Ani and briefly made it their capital. Despite a brief period of peace under the Kara Koyunlu, Ani’s physical structure deteriorated, culminating in a disastrous earthquake in 1319 that destroyed the city much further.
The city’s final years of grandeur occurred in the 14th century, when Tamerlane seized it during his invasions. After Tamerlane died, Ani fell into relative obscurity, with authority of the city passing to numerous dynasties. The Safavid Empire seized possession of the city in the early 16th century, but it fell under Ottoman power in 1579.
Even as the city crumbled into ruins, Ani’s story captivated archaeologists and historians alike. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, European tourists and students began to discover the city’s historical treasures. Extensive excavations, headed by Georgian archaeologist Nikolai Marr, showed the splendor of Ani’s architecture and unearthed numerous antiquities. Despite these efforts, Ani’s ruins were further destroyed in the early twentieth century, particularly during World War I and the subsequent battles that marked the end of the Ottoman Empire.
Ani became a part of the Republic of Turkey after its formation in 1923. The city’s remains were mainly abandoned in the twentieth century, with the exception of a small village that briefly inhabited its walls. Despite this, Ani remains an important archaeological site, and visitors come to connect with the heritage of a city that once served as a beacon of Armenian culture and civilization.
Until 2004, entrance to the historic city of Ani was subject to permission from the Turkish Ministry of Culture. The site, with its immense archeological and cultural significance, was located in a delicate geopolitical zone on the border between Turkey and Armenia. Photography was completely outlawed in the 1980s due to its location near the Turkish-Soviet border, which was a sensitive area during the Cold War. This restriction was part of a larger effort to control the flow of information and prevent potential surveillance or intelligence collection from outside sources. The prohibition on photography emphasized the need of keeping control over the region and its legacy in the face of strained political ties.
Access to the site is still difficult to gain. Visitors from the Armenian side can see Ani from Shirak Province, where an observation point near Haykadzor offers a glimpse of the ruin. However, the view from this vantage point is limited, and the information panel, while informative, does not represent the magnificence of the site itself. On the Turkish side, the outpost of Kharkov provides a wonderful perspective, although access is strictly limited. Border troops and Russian military personnel patrol the region, allowing only those with the appropriate approval to enter. To secure formal entry, one needs obtain clearance from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Yerevan, which takes about a week and, amazingly, is free of charge.
The historic city of Ani has long been a source of conflict between Armenia and Turkey. According to The Economist, Armenians have accused the Turkish government of abandoning Ani, considering it as a form of chauvinism. Many people believe that the site’s neglect reflects a larger political and cultural disdain for Armenian heritage. In contrast, Turkey’s response to these claims concentrates on the harm imposed on Ani from across the border. Turkish officials report that explosives from Armenian quarries have shook the city’s remnants. The quarries used to extract building materials have created enormous vibrations, which have led to the degradation of Ani’s already weak structures.
This continuous discussion emphasizes the delicate relationship between historical preservation and national identity. Ani, formerly the prosperous capital of the medieval Armenian Kingdom, is now embroiled in a geopolitical tug-of war. The arguments over its preservation are about more than just stone and mortar; they also involve wider issues of ownership, cultural memory, and historical heritage. As a result, Ani remains both a symbol of Armenia’s past splendor and a flashpoint in the larger regional war.
Ani, dubbed a “ghost city” by pundits, has been deserted for more than 300 years. Its solitude serves as a striking reminder of the fragility of civilization. The city, once a thriving metropolis, is now encircled by a Turkish military zone, further isolating it from the contemporary Republic of Armenia. Its history has been one of steady decline, with natural and man-made disasters compounding the damage.
Ani has endured centuries of neglect, earthquakes, and cultural cleansing. The city has suffered from the ravages of time, vandalism, and the irresponsible interventions of amateur restorers and excavators. Many of its monuments have deteriorated further due to a lack of a coordinated and long-term conservation strategy. Quarrying activities, in particular, have had a terrible impact, with great sections of Ani’s old architecture under threat from commercial stone exploitation.
The ongoing loss of Ani’s legacy has not gone ignored. Observers point to a painful irony: while the city’s ruins represent a bygone era of cultural and architectural splendor, they are now frequently on the verge of being obliterated from history entirely. Despite this, the city’s ruins remain as a tribute to its previous greatness, providing visitors with a look into a past that continues to shape the region’s cultural character.
The importance of preserving Ani’s architectural and cultural history is generally acknowledged. According to the Landmarks Foundation, a group dedicated to protecting sacred sites, Ani requires continuing care, regardless of whether government eventually obtains sovereignty over the monument. The foundation argues that Ani is more than just a historical item; it is a cultural asset that transcends national and political boundaries. Its significance extends beyond Armenia, making its upkeep a shared obligation.
Natural calamities have had a tremendous impact on Ani’s architecture. Earthquakes in 1319, 1832, and 1988 caused severe damage and weakened the city’s infrastructure. These earthquake shocks, combined with the aforementioned problems of neglect and vandalism, have put Ani at risk of permanent destruction. Despite these hurdles, there is yet hope. Local and international organizations have worked extensively to raise awareness about Ani’s situation and get funding for her preservation.
In its 2010 report Saving Our Vanishing Heritage, the Global Heritage Fund named Ani one of the world’s twelve most endangered sites. The assessment blamed the looming threat on the site’s inadequate management and widespread thievery. These concerns, along with a lack of conservation funding, had brought Ani dangerously close to extinction. However, efforts to ensure the site’s future have continued, with groups such as the World Monuments Fund (WMF) playing a key role.
Ani was named on the World Monuments Fund’s Watch List of the 100 Most Endangered Sites in 1996, 1998, and 2000. In 2011, the group announced that it would undertake conservation work on Ani’s Cathedral and the Church of the Holy Redeemer in partnership with the Turkish Ministry of Culture. This relationship heralded a new era of cross-border cooperation aimed at maintaining Ani’s cultural legacy. In 2023, the WMF partnered with the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation to produce a mobile application that allows for virtual exploration of Ani. This digital tool creates a new way to experience the site’s historical richness while also facilitating its preservation in the face of ongoing challenges.
In March 2015, it was reported that Turkey intended to propose Ani for inclusion on the UNESCO World Heritage Site list. This nomination represented a significant advancement in the preservation of one of the world’s most architecturally and historically important sites. On July 15, 2016, Ani was formally included on the list, signifying a significant accomplishment for the conservation of medieval architecture and the cultural heritage of the area. The inscription served as a testament to the site’s historical significance and acknowledged its exceptional value, as highlighted by art historian Heghnar Zeitlian Watenpaugh, who underscored the numerous advantages, such as improved protection, research expertise, and financial backing, that would arise from its esteemed status. Ani’s classification by UNESCO was not arbitrary; it was based on three fundamental criteria that highlight the importance of this ancient city.
A notable characteristic of Ani that contributed to its UNESCO recognition is its function as a convergence of several cultural traditions. Ani, geographically located along the Silk Road, served as a confluence of Armenian, Georgian, and Islamic cultures. The architectural marvels of Ani exemplify this synthesis, with each structure displaying a distinctive combination of influences. The design, materials, and decorative motifs of the buildings in Ani serve as a striking witness to the cultural exchanges facilitated by centuries of trade, diplomacy, and religious discussion.
The influx of individuals and concepts in Ani led to the emergence of innovative architectural styles, integrating foreign features previously unseen in the region. Visitors from distant regions of Asia, the Middle East, and Europe introduced novel architectural methods and creative practices, which local builders and artisans adeptly integrated into their creations. This amalgamation of elements not only conferred upon Ani its own architectural identity but also distinguished it from other medieval cities, rendering it a rare and invaluable site for the examination of cultural interaction and architectural growth.
The second criterion for Ani’s UNESCO designation is its outstanding exemplification of Armenian cultural and architectural accomplishments, especially its contribution to the evolution of religious architecture. The city’s religious edifices, referred to as the “Ani school,” exemplify the pinnacle of Armenian architectural brilliance. The churches, monasteries, and other religious edifices of Ani are distinguished by their sophisticated stonework, elaborate carvings, and pioneering designs, which were revolutionary for their era.
The Ani school demonstrates a profound link to Armenia’s religious tradition, but its architectural style is dynamic, evolving in response to shifting artistic and technological developments. The uniqueness of Ani’s religious structures is attributed to its utilization of indigenous materials and methods, which narrate the spiritual and cultural narrative of the city’s residents. Ani serves as a vital emblem of the Armenians’ profound historical and religious heritage, and the architectural legacy of the Ani school continues to inspire significant pride among the Armenian populace. The elegance and complexity of Ani’s structures were avant-garde, showcasing the extraordinary accomplishments of Armenian architects and craftsmen.
The third and final criterion that ensured Ani’s inclusion on the UNESCO World Heritage List is its exceptional portrayal of the progress of medieval architecture over six centuries, from the 7th to the 13th centuries AD. Ani is one of the most unique locations globally, featuring practically every category of medieval architecture, including military strongholds, religious edifices, and civic structures. These architectural styles, indicative of the evolving requirements of the city’s varied populace, exemplify the technological progress and design innovation of the era.
Ani’s structures are not merely isolated masterpieces; collectively, they constitute a comprehensive representation of medieval architectural evolution. The city’s layout, from its initial constructions to increasingly intricate designs, offers a unified account of urban evolution and architectural advancement. Every structure, be it a church, mosque, or castle, provides insight into the religious, military, and civic goals of its era. The variety of styles and the ongoing advancement of construction methods render Ani an exceptional reservoir of historical and architectural knowledge.
Following its designation as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, Ani has been categorized as a 1st-degree archaeological conservation site, a classification that guarantees substantial protection and continuous preservation efforts for its integrity. UNESCO’s protective initiatives extend beyond the site, including the adjacent regions, which are classified as third-degree archaeological conservation zones. The Ministry of Culture and Tourism is chiefly accountable for the preservation of Ani, with supplementary assistance from the General Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums, which is instrumental in repair and maintenance activities. Local branches also participate in preservation initiatives, collaborating to guarantee that Ani’s cultural heritage is protected for future generations.
During its 40th Session, the World Heritage Committee Member States emphasized Ani’s potential as a paradigm for modern international relations. The committee observed that the cosmopolitan character of medieval Ani, characterized by its amalgamation of cultures and traditions, might inspire the promotion of understanding and collaboration in contemporary society. The participation of the international community in safeguarding this remarkable archeological site highlights its global importance and the necessity of protecting cultural assets for the welfare of humanity.
Ani, the ancient Armenian capital, exemplifies the creativity and resilience of a civilization that flourished in a challenging environment. The city’s great edifices, albeit frequently in decay, provide insight into the magnificence of a past epoch. Ani’s monuments, largely constructed from local volcanic basalt, reflect the unique geology of the region. This tufa stone, recognized for its malleability, diverse colors, and intricate texture, has enhanced the city’s architecture with aesthetic appeal and resilience. Notwithstanding centuries of conflict, earthquakes, and natural disasters, these edifices persist in eliciting awe. Among the numerous edifices that previously characterized Ani’s skyline, several are notable for their historical and architectural importance.
The Cathedral of Ani, referred to as Surp Asdvadzadzin (the Church of the Holy Mother of God), was established during the reign of King Smbat II in 989. Construction, however, ceased after the king’s demise, and it was not finalized until 1001 (or 1010, contingent upon the interpretation of an inscription). Trdat, the foremost architect of medieval Armenia, conceived the architecture of the church. The construction, identified as a domed basilica, was innovative in its incorporation of architectural features ultimately linked to Gothic architecture—pointed arches, clustered piers, and an elevated central dome, which unfortunately fell in 1319. The Cathedral’s sophisticated design elements rendered it a groundbreaking creation, preceding the Gothic style by several centuries and providing a striking glimpse into the architectural advancements of the era.
The Church of St. Gregory of Tigran Honents, completed in 1215, is one of the most well-preserved monuments in Ani and exemplifies medieval Armenian architecture. The church, commissioned by the wealthy merchant Tigran Honents during the Zakarid dynasty, is distinguished by its exquisite ornamentation and complex stone carvings on its exterior. The carvings, illustrating both actual and legendary beings, occupy the spandrels between the blind arcades around the cathedral, augmenting its aesthetic allure. The church contains an extraordinary series of murals illustrating events from the lives of Saint Gregory the Illuminator and Christ. This comprehensive fresco cycle, created by Georgian painters, is an uncommon element in Armenian religious architecture. The church’s interior features representations of St. Nino, recognized for converting the Georgians to Christianity, highlighting the interrelation of cultural and religious influences throughout this era.
Built shortly after 1035, the Church of the Holy Redeemer (Surb Prkich) is distinguished by its unusual architectural design. The church’s unusual design includes 19 external sides and eight apses, supporting a prominent central dome. Commissioned by Prince Ablgharib Pahlavid to enshrine a relic of the True Cross, the church remained predominantly intact until 1955, when a catastrophic storm resulted in the collapse of the eastern side. The design, both remarkable and innovative, exemplifies the sophisticated engineering skill characteristic of Ani’s sacred building.
Dating from the late 10th century, the Church of St. Gregory of the Abughamrents is a modest yet important edifice in Ani’s ecclesiastical context. The church, presumably constructed as a private chapel for the prominent Pahlavuni family, exhibits a centered design with a dome supported by a drum. It also features six exedera, or semicircular recesses, in its interior. The neighboring mausoleum, built in 1040 and now diminished to its foundations, formerly functioned as the burial site for the Pahlavuni family members.
King Gagik’s Church of St. Gregory, known as Gagikashen, was constructed between 1001 and 1005 as an architectural tribute to the renowned cathedral of Zvartnots. The church, designed by the acclaimed architect Trdat, features a layout that resembles Zvartnots, characterized by a quatrefoil core encircled by a circular ambulatory. Despite the church’s brevity—its demise transpired shortly after its construction—its remnants, unearthed by Nikolai Marr in the early 20th century, offer significant insight into the magnitude and aspirations of Ani’s architectural pursuits.
The Church of the Holy Apostles, established in 1031 by the Pahlavuni family, functioned as a site of worship for the archbishops of Ani. Despite being mostly dilapidated, the church’s architecture exemplifies the inscribed quatrefoil style, including prominent corner chambers. Sections of the church’s narthex, embellished with elaborate stonework, persist, providing insight into the artistry that once characterized the location. Early 20th-century excavations uncovered the foundations of supplementary structures that previously encircled the church, however a significant portion of this area has since been obliterated.
The precise construction date of Surp Stephanos Church remains ambiguous; nonetheless, an edict from 1218 designates it as a Georgian church. During the medieval era, the word ‘Georgian’ referred to the devotion to the Chalcedonian religion, which was accepted by several Armenians in Ani. The church’s connection to the Georgian Church reflects the intricate religious dynamics of the era, characterized by the intersection of ethnic and denominational identities.
The Mosque of Manuchihr, named for the founder of the Shaddadid dynasty, boasts a minaret embellished with Kufic inscriptions. Although the mosque was initially built in the 11th century, its prayer hall was enlarged in the 12th or 13th centuries. Restoration initiatives initiated in 2020 aim to conserve this significant edifice, which has historically represented the city’s Islamic heritage. The mosque’s significance in Ani’s architectural history is amplified by its connection to the Shaddadid family, which governed the city at a time of political and cultural change.
The citadel, or Midjnaberd, previously served as the fortress of the Bagratid monarchs of Ani, dominating the southern boundary of the city. The citadel’s defensive walls, originating from the 7th century, were an essential component of the city’s fortifications. Within the citadel, the remnants of a royal palace, multiple churches, and numerous undetermined structures have been discovered. The palace church, originating from the 6th or 7th century, is the oldest extant church in Ani and exemplifies the city’s early architectural evolution.
The defensive walls of Ani were essential for its security, especially on the northern side, where the lack of natural barriers rendered the city susceptible to assault. A dual line of fortifications, reinforced over time with supplementary towers, safeguarded the city from assailants. Prominent gateways, like the Lion Gate, the Kars Gate, and the Dvin Gate (also known as the Chequer-Board Gate), functioned as significant access points to the city. The walls, initially built during King Smbat’s reign (977–989), were further fortified by following monarchs and stand as a witness to Ani’s strategic significance in the medieval era.
Various minor monuments are dispersed over the terrain of Ani. This encompasses a convent referred to as the Virgins’ Chapel, many smaller churches, and a single-arched bridge over the Arpa River. The relics of many bathhouses, oil presses, and opulent palaces that once embellished the city are also significant. Excavations have uncovered streets adorned with stores, offering additional understanding of the daily life and economy of Ani at its zenith.
The Cave Village of Ani, a fascinating site, is hewn into the rocks encircling the city. This settlement zone, perhaps a consequence of urban expansion as Ani expanded beyond its initial boundaries, provides insight into the adaptive methods of its residents. The cave houses, some featuring frescoes, are being utilized by local animals, however their historical and architectural importance is indisputable. The cave church, embellished with vibrant frescoes, is a prominent feature of this region, illustrating the convergence of religious activity and daily lives within Ani’s larger urban framework.